P. Massin et al., The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems - A frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur, J ARTHROPLA, 15(1), 2000, pp. 93-101
We determined the range of sizes for a system of monoblock femoral prosthes
es that would provide adequate (a term defined in the text) fill in the fro
ntal plane and restore femoral offset and leg length. We performed an anato
mic study, based on measurements in 200 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs.
If diaphyseal filling implants are to be used, 9 sizes are sufficient to o
btain excellent canal filling and restoration of femoral offset in >80% of
cases, assuming that the level of neck osteotomy can vary over a l-cn range
. When using metaphyseal filling implants, only a limited adjustment can be
obtained from the level of neck osteotomy. A system limited to 8 sizes app
roximates the anatomy of the femoral canal with satisfactory precision in 7
3% of cases. If such a system is provided with only a single neck shaft ang
le for each stem size, it does not allow restoration of the biomechanical c
enter of the hip in >67% of cases. A system of 8 sizes of 1 neck/shaft angl
e and a 22-mm modular head restores the anatomy in only 49% of cases. Appro
ximating the frontal anatomy of 85% of femora with an implant filling the m
etaphysis requires at least 15 sizes distributed in 3 metaphyseal configura
tions, each supplied with 2 different neck shaft angles.