Mr. Danter et al., The effect of cement restrictors on the occlusion of the humeral canal - An in vitro comparative study of 2 devices, J ARTHROPLA, 15(1), 2000, pp. 113-119
An in vitro study investigated the efficacy of cement restrictor devices on
cement containment and penetration within the humerus. Eight pairs of pres
erved humeri were prepared using advanced cementing technique followed by i
nsertion of 1 of 2 cement restrictors. Low-viscosity cement was injected fo
llowed by sham humeral stem insertion. Each specimen was sectioned into tra
nsverse 10-mm slices. slices were photographed and digitized to quantify th
e cement/stem and canal cross-sectional area. Cement penetration was determ
ined from the ratio of cement area to canal area. A significant increase in
cement penetration was observed among slices from distal to proximal for b
oth restrictors (P =.02). There was no significant difference in cement pen
etration, leakage, or migration between restrictors. Five of the 8 specimen
s migrated, with means of 21.5 +/- 25.0 mm and 24.0 +/- 36.0 mm for the pol
yethylene and silicone restrictors. Leakage or migration resulted in a sign
ificant decrease in cement penetration with the polyethylene restrictors (P
=.001). In the silicone restrictor group, migration resulted in decreased
cement penetration (P =.04). When using advanced cementing techniques, intr
amedullary restrictors allow improved cement penetration; however, they do
not ensure cement containment.