Comparison of young clinical investigators' accuracy and reproducibility when measuring pulmonary and skin surface nodules using a circumferential measurement versus a standard caliper measurement: American Association for Cancer Research/American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Trials Workshop
Wl. Monsky et al., Comparison of young clinical investigators' accuracy and reproducibility when measuring pulmonary and skin surface nodules using a circumferential measurement versus a standard caliper measurement: American Association for Cancer Research/American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Trials Workshop, J CL ONCOL, 18(2), 2000, pp. 437-444
Purpose: The clinical investigator must understand that errors in measuring
tumors can greatly affect such clinical-trial end points as tumor response
. We performed a prospective, controlled study of tumor measurements that c
ompared circumferential measurements made with a loop planimeter with linea
r measurements made with a standard caliper.
Methods: Using a cross-over design, 76 clinical oncology fellows/junior onc
ology faculty members attending a Methods in Clinical Cancer Research Works
hop sponsored by the American Association for Cancer Research and the Ameri
can Society of Clinical Oncology measured five pulmonary nodule phantoms th
at ranged in size from 1.76 to 13.21 cm(2) and five surface nodule phantoms
with sizes ranging from 2.3 to 12.9 cm(2). To perform these measurements,
they used both a loop planimeter and a caliper. Forty-two and 40 participan
ts repeated measurements 3 days later on pulmonary and surface nodules. Acc
uracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency were evaluated.
Results: The linear caliper measurements overestimated pulmonary nodule and
surface nodule size by a median of 37% and 23%, respectively. Circumferent
ial loop planimeter measurements overestimated pulmonary nodule size and su
rface nodule size by a median of 8% and 17%, respectively. Interobserver re
producibility for the planimeter was greater than that for the caliper, as
evidenced by thinner measurement interquartile ranges. Furthermore, intraob
server reproducibility was higher for the planimeter, with its variability
being only 31.4% and 25.5% as large as that of the caliper when measuring t
he pulmonary and surface nodules, respectively.
Conclusion: Circumferential measurements provide better accuracy, reproduci
bility, and speed in measuring both pulmonary and surface nodules than do p
erpendicular diameters, (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.