Optimization of oral etoposide dosage in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using the fraction of dose absorbed measured for each patient

Citation
A. El-yazigi et al., Optimization of oral etoposide dosage in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using the fraction of dose absorbed measured for each patient, J CLIN PHAR, 40(2), 2000, pp. 153-160
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00912700 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
153 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-2700(200002)40:2<153:OOOEDI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
This study was undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetics of etoposide for optimizing its oral dosage in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymph oma (NHL) using the fraction of dose absorbed calculated from the data gene rated from first oral and intravenous doses in the same patient. Twenty-thr ee NHL patients (ages 61-95 years) entered this study. Each received 50 mg/ m(2) of etoposide by 1-hour IV infusion, which was repeated every 24 hours for 5 days. The second cycle commenced on day 21, with etoposide being admi nistered by mouth at a dose as close to 50 mg/m(2) as possible. Serial bloo d samples were collected and analyzed for etoposide by HPLC. The fraction o f dose absorbed (F) was calculated as F = (AUC(or)/AUC(iv)) (D-iv/D-or), an d etoposide was then given orally for the following 20 days at a daily dose equivalent to D-or/F. After 1 week free of etoposide administration, a sec ond cycle of oral etoposide at the adjusted dose was given for 21 days. The mean +/- SD vaIuesfor t(1/2 beta), t(max), C-max, CLTor, and MRT observed following the first oral dose were 8.98 +/- 4.84 h, 1.39 +/- 0.96 h, 0.083 +/- 0.046 mg.L-1/mg.m(-2), 1.89 +/- 1.2 L.h(-1)/m(2), and 10.37 +/- 2.76 h, respectively and those observed following the first intravenous dose were 8.05 +/- 5.11 h, 1.57 +/- 0.17 h, 0.142 +/- 0.043 mg.L-1/mg.m(-2), 1.25 +/- 0.44 L.h(-1)/m(2), and 7.69 +/- 1.53 h, respectively. The mean +/- SD of F was 0.80 +/- 0.34. The data obtained indicate that optimization of etoposi de oral dosage using F yielded good clinical results while keeping the morb idity at a level that is similar to that of the IV administration. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000;40:153-160 (C)2000 the American College of C linical Pharmacology.