Effectiveness of antipsychotic therapy in a naturalistic setting: A comparison between risperidone, perphenazine, and haloperidol

Citation
Kc. Coley et al., Effectiveness of antipsychotic therapy in a naturalistic setting: A comparison between risperidone, perphenazine, and haloperidol, J CLIN PSY, 60(12), 1999, pp. 850-856
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
01606689 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
850 - 856
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-6689(199912)60:12<850:EOATIA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic ineffectiveness and noncompliance with antipsychoti c agents are major contributors to rehospitalization in patients with psych otic disorders. It is unknown whether risperidone's favorable side effect p rofile compared with that of the conventional antipsychotics results in imp roved compliance and reduced hospitalizations in a naturalistic setting. Th e purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment with risp eridone reduces readmission rates and associated costs when compared with t reatment with perphenazine or haloperidol. Method: Inpatients prescribed either risperidone, perphenazine, or haloperi dol between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, as a single oral antips ychotic at discharge were retrospectively identified. Data were collected f or that index hospitalization and for a 1-year follow-up period. Primary ou tcome measures included readmission rates, changes in antipsychotic therapy , anticholinergic drug use, and costs. Results: There were 202 evaluable patients (81 treated with risperidone, 78 with perphenazine, and 43 with haloperidol), Baseline demographics were si milar between groups except that more patients in the risperidone group had a primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder or had been hospitalized in the year prior to study. The percentage of patients readmitted during the 1-yea r follow-up period was similar among drug groups (41% risperidone, 26% perp henazine, and 35% haloperidol) when controlled for baseline differences in diagnosis and hospitalization history (p = .32). Anticholinergic drug use w as more common in the haloperidol group (p = .004). Mean yearly cost (drug + hospitalization) in the risperidone group was $20,317, nearly double that in the other treatment groups (p < .001). Conclusion: The results from this naturalistic study indicate that the high cost of risperidone is not offset by a reduction in readmission rates when compared with conventional antipsychotics.