Synthetic anxiolytic drugs are effective for treating anxiety, but they are
burdened with adverse effects, Constraints on resources and time often ren
der therapies such as psychologic interventions impracticable. Thus, an eff
ective oral medication with few adverse effects mould be a welcome addition
to the therapeutic repertoire. This systematic review and meta-analysis wa
s aimed at assessing the evidence for or against the efficacy of kava extra
ct as a symptomatic treatment for anxiety. Systematic Literature searches w
ere performed in the computerized databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, AMED,
CISCOM, and the Cochrane Library (all from their respective inception to Ju
ne 1998), The search terms used were kava, kawa, kavain, Piper methysticum,
and Rauschpfeffer (German term for Piper methysticum), Experts on the subj
ect were contacted to provide further information. There were no restrictio
ns regarding the language of publication. Double-blind, randomized, placebo
-controlled trials of oral kava extract for the treatment of anxiety were i
ncluded. All publications were blinded before assessment by a person not in
volved in the study. Data were extracted in a standardized, predefined fash
ion independently by the two reviewers. The methodologic quality of all tri
als was assessed. Superiority of kava extract over placebo was suggested by
all seven reviewed trials, The meta-analysis of three trials suggests a si
gnificant difference in the reduction of the total score on the Hamilton Ra
ting Scale for Anxiety in favor of kava extract (weighted mean difference,
9.69; 95% confidence interval, 3.54-15.83). These data imply that kava extr
act is superior to placebo as a symptomatic treatment for anxiety. Therefor
e, kava extract is an herbal treatment option for anxiety that is worthy of
consideration.