Phosphorus inputs must be estimated accurately to optimize the economic ret
urn to farmers and minimize P loss from seas to surface waters, Currently,
P recommendations are based on the diagnosis of field crop responses by che
mically extracted soil P. However, the inability of chemical extraction to
characterize plant-available P limits the reliability of these recommendati
ons. Major sources of P mobilized by plant roots include P ions in solution
and those from soil constituents, which replenish and buffer solution. A m
echanistic evaluation of soil P supply should therefore be based on the des
cription of P ion transfer between soil constituents and solution. Sorption
, desorption, electro-ultrafiltration (EUF), and isotopic exchange studies
show that an adequate modeling of this quantity [Q((CP,t))] of P ions must
account for both the concentration of P ions in soil solution (C-P) and tim
e (t). In one long-term field experiment, the Q((CP,t)) description was not
affected by crop rotation and mineral fertilization histories; therefore,
Q((CP,t)) changes are fully explained by C-P changes, In two field experime
nts, Cp changes were linearly correlated with the cumulative P budget, inpu
ts, and outputs over years. In three field experiments, the soil type effec
t on the relative maize (Zea mays L.) response curve was taken into account
using the ability of soil P to replenish solution P for 1 d. The residual
variance of this diagnosis is halved compared to Olsen's extraction. Althou
gh more information is necessary, accuracy is improved when soil testing is
based on mobility of P ions.