Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population

Citation
C. Bolton-smith et al., Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population, J EPIDEM C, 54(2), 2000, pp. 143-148
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
ISSN journal
0143005X → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
143 - 148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-005X(200002)54:2<143:AOTEPO>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Study objective-To determine whether self reported heights and weights from Scottish adults can provide an accurate assessment of obesity prevalence i n the population. Design-Standardised clinic measurements of weight and height were compared against self reported values on a postal questionnaire in the fourth Scotti sh MONICA cross sectional study. Setting-A sex and five year age band stratified random population sample dr awn from general practitioner registers in north Glasgow in 1995. Response rate 63% for men and 62% for women. Participants-A total of 865 men and 971 women aged between 25 and 63 years. Results-Men and women under-reported their weight by a mean (SD) of 0.63 (3 .45) kg and 0.95 (2.64) kg respectively, and their height by a mean (SD) of 1.3 (2.50) cm and 1.7 (2.37) cm respectively. Estimated body mass index, B MI (kg/m(2)) varied from true (measured) EMI by +0.19 (1.40) for men and by +0.17 (1.34) for women. The only age/sex group in which EMI was under-esti mated from self reports (mean 0.2) was the 55-64 year old women. Prediction equations that explained 90% (men) and 88% (women) of the difference betwe en self reported and measured height included age and self reported weight. The equivalent prediction equations for weight explained 93% of the differ ence between self reported and measured weight for men and included smoking and diabetic status, while for women 96% of the variance was explained wit h no further variables being significant. Sensitivity and specificity for d etermining clinical obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30) were 83% and 96% respectively for men, and 89% and 97% for women. Conclusions-This Scottish population was unique in the under-reporting of h eight as well as weight, which resulted in BMI estimates with low error. Th ese data suggest that self reported weights and heights would be satisfacto ry for the monitoring of obesity prevalence in Scotland.