Amd. Wolf et Jb. Schorling, Does informed consent alter elderly patients' preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomized trial, J GEN INT M, 15(1), 2000, pp. 24-30
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of Informed consent on elderly patients' co
lorectal cancer (CRC) screening preferences. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled
trial,
SETTING: Four general internal medicine practices,
PATIENTS: We studied 399 elderly patients visiting their primary care provi
der for routine office visits.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either ther a scripted c
ontrol message briefly describing CRC screening methods or one of two infor
mational interventions simulating an informed consent presentation about CR
C screening, One intervention described CRC mortality risk reduction in rel
ative terms; the other, in absolute terms,
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measure was intent to begin
or continue fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, or
both, There was no difference in screening interest between the control gro
up and the two information groups (p = .8). The majority (63%) of patients
intended to begin or continue CRC screening, Informed patients were able to
gauge more accurately the positive predictive value of screening (p = .000
9). Control patients rated the efficacy of screening higher than did patien
ts receiving relative risk reduction information, who rated it higher than
did patients receiving absolute risk reduction information (p = .0002).
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients appeared to understand CRC screening informat
ion and use it to gauge the efficacy of screening, but provision of informa
tion had no impact on their preferences for screening. In view of the large
proportion who preferred not to be screened, we conclude that elderly pati
ents should be involved in the screening decision, However, factors other t
han provision of information must determine their CRC screening preferences
.