Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research CommunityClimate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry

Citation
Mc. Barth et al., Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research CommunityClimate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry, J GEO RES-A, 105(D1), 2000, pp. 1387-1415
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Volume
105
Issue
D1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1387 - 1415
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Sulfur chemistry has been incorporated in the National Center for Atmospher ic Research Community Climate Model in an internally consistent manner with other parameterizations in the model. The model predicts mixing Processes that control the mixing ratio of these species include the emissions of DMS and SO2, transport of each species, gas- and aqueous-phase chemistry, wet deposition, and dry deposition of species. Modeled concentrations agree qui te well with observations for DMS and H2O2 fairly well for SO2, and not as well for SO42- The modeled SO42- tends to underestimate observed SO42- at t he surface and overestimate observations in the upper troposphere. The SO2 and SO42- species were tagged according to the chemical production pathway and whether the sulfur was of anthropogenic or biogenic origin. Although aq ueous-phase reactions in cloud accounted for 81% of the sulfate production rate, only similar to 50-60% of the sulfate burden in the troposphere was d erived from cloud chemistry. Because cloud chemistry is an important source of sulfate in the troposphere, the importance of H2O2 concentrations and p H values was investigated. When prescribing H2O2 concentrations to clear-sk y values instead of predicting H2O2, the global-averaged, annual-averaged i n-cloud production of sulfate increased. Setting the pH of the drops to 4.5 also increased the in-cloud production of sulfate. In both sensitivity sim ulations, the increased in-cloud production of sulfate decreased the burden of sulfate because less SO2 was available for gas-phase conversion, which contributes more efficiently to the tropospheric sulfate burden than does a queous-phase conversion.