A quantitative study of calcium deposition in the aortic wall following medtronic freestyle compared with homograft aortic root replacement. A prospective randomized trial
G. Melina et al., A quantitative study of calcium deposition in the aortic wall following medtronic freestyle compared with homograft aortic root replacement. A prospective randomized trial, J HEART V D, 9(1), 2000, pp. 97-103
Background and aim of the study: Unstented aortic valve substitutes offer m
any of the theoretical advantages of homografts such as superior hemodynami
c performance and enhanced durability, particularly when inserted as a root
. Many of these depend on the maintained flexibility of the valve component
s. Calcification of the aortic wall may adversely affect these phenomena. E
lectron beam computed tomography has been used to evaluate aortic wall calc
ification in patients undergoing aortic root replacement in a prospective r
andomized trial designed to compare the Medtronic Freestyle valve with the
homograft valve replacement.
Methods: Patients were followed with electron beam computed tomography scan
s of the aortic root at six-monthly intervals after surgery. A calcificatio
n score (Hounsfield units) and a calcified volume score (mm(3)) were obtain
ed from each scan using a new modified technique. Results were related to h
emodynamic data from echocardiography. The prevalence of calcification was
also related to the homograft donor age,
Results: Seventy-six patients (age range: 40-79 years) were randomized to r
oot replacement with either homograft (n = 31) or Freestyle (n = 45) valves
. Fifty-three scans of the aortic root were performed postoperatively in 37
patients. No statistical difference between the two groups was found at si
x and 12 months after surgery. However, after 18 months the calcified volum
e score was 5903.8 +/- 2356.8 mm(3) in the homograft versus 2725.6 +/- 1500
.5 mm(3) in the Freestyle group (p = 0.017). There was a correlation betwee
n calcification score, calcified volume score and left ventricular mass (r
= 0.323, p = 0.093 and r = 0.350, p = 0.068, respectively) on the one hand,
and calcification score, calcified volume score and valve size on the othe
r hand (r = 0.178, p = 0.466 and r = 0.068, p = 0.780, respectively).
Conclusions: Electron beam computed tomography provides a powerful tool for
the detection of calcium in the aortic wall of valve grafts. There is a lo
w rate of calcification during the first 18 months in the Medtronic Freesty
le valve, and this appears to be lower than that observed in homografts. Lo
nger-term follow up of the aortic root in these patients is required. This
is an ongoing study.