The view that recent changes in the distribution of income primarily reflec
t technology rather than trade may be the majority opinion, but has been ha
rshly criticized by some trade economists. This paper will argue that the c
ritique in fact misses the point, essentially because the critics undertake
the wrong thought experiments. Trade volumes are not irrelevant: if one po
ses the question correctly, one immediately realizes that small trade volum
es are inconsistent with a story that attributes large distributional effec
ts to trade. The factor bias of technological change is not immaterial, exc
ept in the case where such change takes place in a small open economy (as o
pposed to one that can affect world prices), and where technical change occ
urs only in that economy (rather than occurring simultaneously in other eco
nomies as well); since the real situation does not meet either criterion, f
actor bias definitely does matter. Most surprisingly, the much maligned use
of a factor content approach to infer the effects of trade on factor price
s turns out to be an entirely justified procedure when carefully applied. (
C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.