Gm. Earhart et Psg. Stein, Scratch-swim hybrids in the spinal turtle: Blending of rostral scratch andforward swim, J NEUROPHYS, 83(1), 2000, pp. 156-165
Turtles with a complete transection of the spinal cord just posterior to th
e forelimb enlargement at the D2-D3 segmental border produced coordinated r
hythmic hindlimb movements. Ipsilateral stimulation of cutaneous afferents
in the mid-body shell bridge evoked a rostral scratch. Electrical stimulati
on of the contralateral dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) at the anterior cut fa
ce of the D3 segment activated a forward swim. Simultaneous stimulation of
the ipsilateral shell bridge and the contralateral DLF elicited a scratch-s
wim hybrid: a behavior that blended features of both rostral scratch and fo
rward swim into each cycle of rhythmic movement. This is the first demonstr
ation of a scratch-locomotion hybrid in a spinal vertebrate. The rostral sc
ratch and the forward swim shared some characteristics: alternating hip fle
xion and extension, similar timing of knee extensor activity within the hip
cycle, and a behavioral event during which force was exerted against a sub
strate. During each cycle, each behavior exhibited three sequential stages,
preevent, event, and postevent. The rostral scratch event was a rub of the
fool against the stimulated shell site. The forward swim event was a power
stroke, a hip extension movement with the foot held in a vertical position
with toes and webbing spread. The two behaviors differed with respect to se
veral features: amount of hip flexion and extension, electromyogram (EMG) a
mplitudes, and EMG duty cycles. Scratch-swim hybrids displayed two events,
the scratch rub and the swim powerstroke, within each cycle. Hybrid hip fle
xion excursion, knee extensor EMGs, and hip flexor EMGs were similar to tho
se of the scratch; hybrid hip extension excursion and hip extensor EMGs wer
e similar to those of the swim. The hybrid also had three sequential stages
during each cycle: I) a combined scratch prerub and swim postpowerstroke,
2) a scratch rub that also served as a swim prepowerstroke, and 3) a swim p
owerstroke that also served as a scratch postrub. Merging of the rostral sc
ratch with the forward swim was possible because of similarities between th
e sequential stages of the two forms, making them biomechanically compatibl
e for hybrid formation. Kinematic and myographic similarities between the r
ostral scratch and the forward swim support the hypothesis that the two beh
aviors share common neural circuitry. The common features of the sequential
stages of each behavior and che production of scratch-swim hybrids provide
additional support for the hypothesis of a shared core of spinal cord neur
ons common to both rostral scratch and forward swim.