Fracture resistance of four different restorations for cuspal replacement

Citation
A. Segura et R. Riggins, Fracture resistance of four different restorations for cuspal replacement, J ORAL REH, 26(12), 1999, pp. 928-931
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
0305182X → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
928 - 931
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-182X(199912)26:12<928:FROFDR>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of four po sterior restorations involving an entire cusp replacement. Four groups were established, each containing eight caries-free mandibular molars, similar in size and anatomic form. A mesio-occlusal preparation including the lingu al cusp was prepared on all teeth. Group A were restored with a pin-retaine d amalgam. Group B were restored with amalgam and a meta adhesive. Group C were restored with a composite resin with a beta-glass quartz insert. Group D were restored with composite resin and a HEMA adhesive. All specimens we re mounted in acrylic and stored in artificial saliva for 30 days. Each spe cimen was loaded in compression at a 90 degrees angle in an Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 cm/min. Results demonstrated the mea n (SD) failure loads in kilograms for each group to be: A, 1155 (388); B, 1 232 (436); C, 1345 (375); D, 1595 (373). Analysis of variance indicated no significant difference among groups at P < 0.05. Although the values for th e composite resin restoration with the adhesive were higher than the other restorative techniques.