This article examines the role of public opinion surveys in the making of t
urning-point decisions (TPDs) that lead to peace between enemies. We presen
t hitherto unpublished data from private polls prepared for Yitzhak Rabin i
n order to gauge public opinion regarding the Oslo peace process. In analyz
ing these data we suggest a theoretical model that outlines the role of pub
lic opinion in policymaking. The model considers Holsti's (1996) four major
parameters within the pre-Oslo framework: the issue facing the decisionmak
er; the decisionmaker's beliefs in and sensitivity to public opinion; the p
olitical and social context of the decision; and the stage of policymaking.
We find support for propositions regarding a paradoxical process character
izing Rabin's policy. Rabin used public opinion polls to gauge the public's
support for him as a leader and for taking hawkish decisions, termed credi
bility-building decisions (CBD). These decisions, though seemingly detrimen
tal to the peace process, were perceived as necessary in order to maintain
Rabin's image as a tough-minded leader who would bring peace with the Pales
tinians without sacrificing security. We suggest that public opinion survey
s may be important in monitoring the effects of CBDs on the credibility of
a leader whose goal is to move a peace process forward in a time of uncerta
inty and threat.