We assessed Websites for radiological education. Of several hundred sites i
dentified, 30 were randomly selected for evaluation by two groups of observ
ers. All Web pages were rated with respect to time required to access the i
nformation; structure and organization of the site; image quality; and info
rmation content and relevancy. Rapid access was gained to many educational
radiology Websites, which contained large numbers of interesting radiologic
al images of good quality. A weak point was the structure and organization
of the sites. The greatest variability in ratings was found in the informat
ion content and relevancy of the Websites.