A database of stratus cloud droplet (diameter <50 mu m) size distribution p
arameters, derived from in situ data reported in the existing literature, w
as created, facilitating intercomparison among datasets and quantifying typ
ical values and their variability. From the datasets, which were divided in
to marine and continental groups, several parameters are presented, includi
ng the total number concentration, effective diameter, mean diameter standa
rd deviation of the droplet diameters about the mean diameter, and liquid w
ater content, as well as the parameters of modified gamma and lognormal dis
tributions. In light of these results, the appropriateness of common assump
tions used in remote sensing of cloud droplet size distributions is discuss
ed. For example, vertical profiles of mean diameter, effective diameter, an
d liquid water content agreed qualitatively with expectations based on the
current paradigm of cloud formation. Whereas parcel theory predicts that th
e standard deviation about the mean diameter should decrease with height, t
he results illustrated that the standard deviation generally increases with
height, A feature common to all marine clouds was their approximately cons
tant total number concentration profiles: however, the total number concent
ration profiles of continental clouds were highly variable. Without cloud c
ondensation nuclei spectra, classification of clouds into marine and contin
ental groups is based on indirect methods. After reclassification of four s
ets of measurements in the database, there was a fairly clear dichotomy bet
ween marine and continental clouds, but a great deal of variability within
each classification.
The relevant applications of this study lie in radiative transfer and clima
te issues, rather than in cloud formation and dynamics. Techniques that inv
ert remotely sensed measurements into cloud droplet size distributions freq
uently rely on a priori assumptions, such as constant number concentration
profiles and constant spectral width. The results of this paper provide a b
asis for evaluating the sensitivity of these techniques. In particular, the
re were large enough differences in observed droplet spectral widths to sig
nificantly affect remotely sensed determinations of cloud microphysics.