W. Trubel et al., INTRAOPERATIVE CONTROL FOLLOWING FEMORODISTAL REVASCULARIZATION - ANGIOSCOPY IS SUPERIOR TO ANGIOGRAPHY, The thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 42(4), 1994, pp. 199-207
Intraoperative angioscopic control was performed in an early series of
27 patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. The majority were
complex or re-do operations; reversed saphenous vein and PTFE-grafts
were used as bypass material exclusively. Angioscopic findings were co
mpared to conventional angiography with respect to the detection of te
chnical problems leading to further surgical procedures. Angioscopy wa
s feasable in 92.5%, it failed twice due to irrigation problems, which
was before we used a dedicated angioscopy roller-pump. In 6 patients
relevant findings requiring further surgical manipulations were only d
etected angioscopically, in 2 patients such findings were detected by
angioscopy as well as by angiography. Such findings included technical
problems (graft rotation [n = 1], anastomotic narrowing [n = 2]), bal
loon catheter injuries after thromboembolectomy (n = 2) and residual t
hrombi after local thrombectomy (n = 3); 5 of these patients had under
gone previous vascular procedures in the same operation field. After l
ocal correction (n = 5) or placement of a new bypass (n = 3) there was
no early graft failure. This early angioscopic experience confirmed p
revious reports that satisfactory visualization and specific recogniti
on of angiographically unsuspected problems after peripheral reconstru
ctions can be obtained by intraoperative angioscopic control. This was
seen very distinctively in more complex and re-do operations, which w
e see as the cases most needing routine angioscopic control.