Purpose: We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of continuous magnetic stimu
lation on urinary incontinence by studying the urodynamic effect on urethra
l closure and bladder inhibition.
Materials and Methods: A total of 11 patients with stress incontinence and
12 with urge incontinence (7 males and 16 females, mean age 55.8 years) wer
e evaluated. Tn the pilot study urethral pressure profile was performed bef
ore and after 20 Hz. 15-minute (with 1-minute on/30-second off cycles) stim
ulation, and maximum intraurethral pressure was recorded during stimulation
in stress incontinence cases. Cystometry was performed before and during 1
5-minute stimulation at 10 Hz. in urge incontinence cases. In the therapeut
ic study 8 females with stress incontinence, and 3 males and 5 females with
urge incontinence were treated with magnetic stimulation twice a week for
5 weeks.
Results: In the pilot study maximum intraurethral pressure increased by 34%
during stimulation and maximum urethral closure pressure increased by 20.9
% (p = 0.0409) after stimulation in stress incontinence cases, In urge inco
ntinence cases significant increases in bladder capacities at first and max
imum desire to void during stimulation were noted (p = 0.0164 and 0.0208, r
espectively). In the therapeutic study 86% of 7 patients with stress incont
inence and 75% of 8 with urge incontinence were improved, and 1 dropped out
of the study.
Conclusions: Continuous magnetic stimulation was effective on urethral clos
ure and bladder inhibition, and as treatment of urinary incontinence.