Background The C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) is expressed on monocytes an
d facilitates monocyte migration. CCR2 is a prominent receptor for monocyte
chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). This chemokine recruits monocytes to si
tes of inflammation. It has been suggested that CCR2 and its ligand, MCP-1,
play a role in the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis. The goal of this st
udy was to determine the contribution of CCR2 in a murine model of accelera
ted nephrotoxic nephritis. We measured the extent of development of renal d
isease in CCR2 wild-type and knockout mice after the administration of anti
glomerular basement membrane antibody.
Methods. Eight groups of animals were treated (N = 10 per group). Four days
after IgG immunization, CCR2 wild-type and knockout mice received control
serum or nephrotoxic serum. The urinary protein/creatinine ratio was measur
ed on days 1 and 3; plasma and kidneys were collected on days 4 and 7. Kidn
eys were evaluated by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and immunoflu
orescence. The genotype of mice was confirmed by tissue analysis.
Results. Protective effects of CCR2 knockout on the urinary protein/creatin
ine ratio were observed on day 1, as values for this parameter were signifi
cantly lower (35 +/- 3.6) than in nephritic wild-type mice (50 +/- 6.8). Th
ere was a marked increase in proteinuria in nephritic wild-type mice on day
1 compared with vehicle-treated, wild-type animals (5 +/- 1.0). On day 3,
the ameliorative effects of CCR2 knockout were not observed; the increase i
n the urinary protein/creatinine ratio was similar in nephritic CCR2 wild-t
ype (92 +/- 11.2) and knockout mice (102 +/- 9.2). Plasma markers of diseas
e were evaluated on days 4 and 7. At these time points, there were no benef
icial effects of CCR2 receptor knockout on plasma levels of urea nitrogen,
creatinine, albumin, or cholesterol. On day 7, blood urea nitrogen (248 +/-
19.9 mg/dL) and plasma cholesterol were higher in nephritic CCR2 knockout
mice than in wild-type mice (142 +/- 41.7 mg/dL) that received nephrotoxic
serum. Histopathologic injury was more severe in nephritic CCR2 knockout mi
ce than nephritic wild-type mice on day 4 (3.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.3) and
day 7 (3.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.9 +/-. 0.3). By immunohistochemical analysis at d
ay 4, there were significantly fewer mac-2-positive cells, representative o
f macrophages in the,glomeruli of nephritic CCR2 knockout (2.1 +/- 0.6) mic
e than nephritic wild-type (3.9 +/- 0.5) animals. By indirect immunofluores
cence, there was a moderate, diffuse linear IgG deposition of equivalent se
verity present in glomeruli of both wild-type and CCR2 knockout nephritic m
ice.
Conclusion. These results suggest that our strategy was successful in reduc
ing macrophage infiltration, but this model of glomerulonephritis is not so
lely dependent on the presence of CCR2 for progression of disease. After a
transient ameliorative effect on proteinuria, CCR2 knockout led to more sev
ere injury in nephritic mice. This raises the intriguing possibility that a
CCR2 gene product ameliorates glomerulonephritis in this murine model. Alt
hough effects that occur in chemokine knockout mice are not equivalent to t
hose expected with prolonged use of a chemokine antagonist, this study may
nevertheless have implications for consideration of long-term use of chemok
ine antagonists in renal disease.