Background The current systolic blood-pressure threshold for hypertension t
reatment is 140 mm Hg for all adults. WHO and the International Society of
Hypertension have proposed that normal pressure be lower than 130 mm Hg, wi
th an optimum pressure of less than 120 mm Hg. These recommendations are ba
sed largely on the assumption that cardiovascular and overall mortality dep
end in a strictly increasing manner on systolic blood pressure. The Framing
ham study was instrumental in establishing this viewpoint. We reassessed da
ta from that study to find out whether the relation is strictly increasing
or whether there is a threshold in this relation.
Methods We used logistic splines to model the relation of risk of cardiovas
cular and all-cause death with systolic blood pressure, using age-specific
and sex-specific rates. We tested for the independence of the slope paramet
ers from age and sex, and the reduced model with common slopes was used to
produce a model different from the conventional linear logistic model.
Findings Against the predictions of the linear logistic model, neither all-
cause nor cardiovascular deaths depended on systolic blood pressure in a st
rictly increasing manner. The linear logistic model was rejected by the Fra
mingham data. Instead, risk was independent of systolic blood pressure for
all pressures lower than a threshold at the 70th percentile for a person of
a given age and sex. Risk sharply increased with pressure higher than the
80th percentile. Since systolic blood pressure steadily increases with age,
the threshold increases with age, but more rapidly in women than in men.
Interpretation The Framingham data contradict the concept that lower pressu
res imply lower risk and the idea that 140 mm Hg is a useful cut-off value
for hypertension for all adults. There is an age-dependent and sex-dependen
t threshold for hypertension. A substantial proportion of the population wh
o would currently be thought to be at increased risk are, therefore, at no
increased risk.