Objective: To determine the feasibility of perioperative erythropoietin to
avoid blood transfusion in head and neck cancer surgery, Study Design: Retr
ospective chart review. Methods: Ninety-nine patients undergoing surgical r
esection of head and neck tumors at our institution were assessed for demog
raphic data, nutritional parameters, tumor/surgical information, hematologi
cal/transfusion data, and contraindications to erythropoietin, Each transfu
sion was classified as to its appropriateness, and the potential benefit of
erythropoietin was assessed in each patient. A cost analysis was also perf
ormed. Results: Most transfused patients (63%) received too many units. A s
ubgroup at high risk of transfusion was identified who would benefit most f
rom perioperative erythropoietin, Assuming that perioperative erythropoieti
n therapy is equivalent to the transfusion of 4 units, we estimate that the
majority (74%) of transfused patients would not have required a transfusio
n if more stringent transfusion criteria were followed and those at high ri
sk were given perioperative erythropoietin, Although the cost for transfusi
ng 4 units is equivalent to that of a perioperative course of erythropoieti
n, the overall direct cost of erythropoietin treatment would actually have
been more expensive, Conclusions: Perioperative erythropoietin therapy may
be appropriate for a subgroup of head and neck cancer patients, but a prosp
ective randomized controlled study in such a subgroup is needed to better d
efine those most likely to benefit from it and to assess actual cost/benefi
t ratios.