We compared measurements of temporal trends in cancer survival either
based on observed survival or relative survival. Survival rates for cu
taneous malignant melanoma diagnosed in Sweden 1960-1982 were used as
an example. In a proportional hazards model based on observed survival
, the hazard ratio for patients diagnosed during the period 1975-1979
was 0.56 (95% confidence limits 0.49-0.64) in men and 0.45 (0.38-0.53)
in women when the period 1960-1964 was the reference. When relative s
urvival was the outcome measure, during the same period, the hazard ra
tio decreased to 0.47 (0.39-0.56) in men and 0.36 (0.29-0.44) in women
. Thus, the effect of period of diagnosis was larger when the analysis
was based on relative survival rates. The reasons for the differences
between these two alternative measurements are explained in the artic
le and advantages/disadvantages of the two approaches are discussed.