Borsley (1997) criticizes the raising analysis of relative clauses revived
by Kayne (1994) in the framework of antisymmetry theory. Most of his remark
s concern the analysis of English headed relative clauses. This article pre
sents a revised version of Kayne's proposal that provides an answer to thes
e criticisms. It is argued that the raising approach is indeed tenable and
that the analysis of this empirical domain is fully consistent with the res
trictiveness of the antisymmetry theory.