The effects of the ratio of grass silage to concentrates in the diet and restricted dry matter intake on the performance and carcass composition of beef cattle
Rwj. Steen et Dj. Kilpatrick, The effects of the ratio of grass silage to concentrates in the diet and restricted dry matter intake on the performance and carcass composition of beef cattle, LIVEST PROD, 62(2), 2000, pp. 181-192
The effects of the proportion of concentrates in grass silage-based diets a
nd of restricted dry matter (DM) intake were examined using 156 Simmental c
ross Friesian steers which were initially 389 kg Live weight. The animals w
ere reared on high-forage diets until 14 months of age and were then given
grass silage ad Libitum and supplemented with rolled barley which constitut
ed (1) 0, (2) 120, (3) 240 and (4) 360 g/kg total DM intake. Diet 5 consist
ed of grass silage only until 510 kg live weight and diet 4 thereafter, whi
le diet 6 consisted of 640 g silage DM and 360 g barley/kg DM and was offer
ed at 80% of ad libitum intake. Representative groups of animals were slaug
htered initially and serially for each diet at 510, 560 and 610 kg live wei
ght. Increasing the proportion of concentrates in the diet increased metabo
lisable energy intake and carcass gain by 0.042 (S.E. 0.007) MJ/day and 0.7
28 (S.E. 0.036) g/day per g/kg increase in the proportion of concentrates i
n the diet bur did not significantly affect carcass fat content. Restrictin
g dry matter intake by 21% reduced carcass, lean and fat gains by 31, 29 an
d 37%, respectively, and carcass fat content by 13 g/kg. The response in ca
rcass gain per MJ reduction in ME intake was 60% greater when ME intake was
reduced by reducing the proportion of concentrates in the diet rather than
restricting DM intake. Increasing slaughter weight increased carcass fat c
ontent by 39 g/kg per 100 kg increase in slaughter weight. It is concluded
that reducing energy intake by restricting DM intake or reducing the propor
tion of concentrates in the diet reduced the efficiency of carcass and lean
gains. All strategies used to reduce energy intake had only small to modes
t effects on carcass fat content and hence the effect of reducing energy in
take on carcass fat content were equivalent to those of reducing slaughter
weight by only 18 to 45 kg. Consequently for cattle reared on high-forage d
iets reducing slaughter weight is likely to be a more effective approach to
reducing carcass fat content than reducing energy intake during the finish
ing period. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.