Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Citation
Lj. Zhong et al., Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis, LUNG CANC, 27(1), 2000, pp. 3-18
Citations number
79
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
LUNG CANCER
ISSN journal
01695002 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3 - 18
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-5002(200001)27:1<3:ETETSA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate a pooled estimate of relative risk of lung cancer following exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and to determine whether there was any heterogeneity in the pooled estimat es according to selected characteristics of the studies. A total of 35 case -control and five cohort studies providing quantitative estimates of the as sociation between lung cancer and exposure to ETS published between January 1981 and March 1999 were identified. Using fixed- and random-effects model s, we calculated pooled estimates of relative risk for exposure to ETS from subjects: parents (during childhood), spouses. and coworkers. As well, we investigated whether the pooled estimates of relative risk varied by study location, degree of control of potential confounding variables, proportion of cases confirmed histologically, proportion of surrogate respondents, non response rates. and year of publication. The relative risk of lung cancer a mong non smoking women ever exposed to ETS from their husbands' smoking was 1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.29). The pooled relative risk w as 1.19 (95%, CI: 1.10-1.29) for case-control studies and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.0 4-1.62) for cohort studies. In various subgroup and meta-regression analyse s, we found no statistically significant differences by selected characteri stics of the studies. In addition, we found that the risk of lung cancer in creased consistently with increasing levels of exposure. The 11 studies rep orting relative risks among male non smokers yielded LL pooled relative ris k of 1.48 (95% CI: 1.13-1.92) for ever exposed to ETS, and the relative ris k of lung cancer for el er being exposed to ETS at work was a 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05-1.28). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that exposure to ETS increases the risk of lung cancer. While there may be alternative e xplanations to the data, it is more likely that the observed association is not an artifact and that ETS causes lung cancer in non smokers. (C) 2000 E lsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.