Does apolipoprotein E genotype relate to BMD and bone markers in postmenopausal women?

Citation
Am. Heikkinen et al., Does apolipoprotein E genotype relate to BMD and bone markers in postmenopausal women?, MATURITAS, 34(1), 2000, pp. 33-41
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MATURITAS
ISSN journal
03785122 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
33 - 41
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-5122(20000115)34:1<33:DAEGRT>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Objectives: Bone mineral density (BMD) and development of osteoporosis are partly determined by genetic factors. The associations between one of sugge sted candidate, apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotype to bone mineral density ( BMD) and bone biochemical markers was studied in 464 subjects recruited fro m a population-based group of early postmenopausal women (II = 13 100). Add itionally, the influence of apo E genotype on BMD changes during a 5-year f ollow-up with or without hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was investigated . Methods: Participants were randomized into two treatment groups: HRT grou p: Sequential combination of 2 mg estradiol valerate and 1 mg cyproterone a cetate with or without vitamin D-3, 100-300 IU/day + calcium lactate, 500 m g/day (n = 232), and the non-HRT group: Calcium lactate, 500 mg/day alone o r in combination with vitamin D-3, 100-300 IU/day (n = 232). BMD was measur ed from the lumbar spine and proximal femur at baseline and after 5 years o f treatment (n = 352). In a subgroup (n = 59), the serum concentrations of bone biochemical markers (intact osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline p hosphatase (BAP) and type I collagen carboxy-terminal telopeptide (ICTP)) w ere measured at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Results: At baselin e, the BMDs were similar between the five apo E genotype groups (2/3, 2/4, 3/3, 3/4, 4/4). No significant differences in lumbar or femoral neck BMDs o f women with the apo E4 allele were found compared with those without it. T here was a statistically significant difference in 5-year BMD changes betwe en the HRT and non-HRT groups. After 5 years, the BMD of the femoral neck h ad remained constant and the mean lumbar spine BMD had increased by 1.5% in the HRT group, whereas both BMDs had decreased by 4-5% in the non-HRT grou p. However, the apo E genotype did not modify the changes in BMD in either group. Additionally, the baseline concentrations of bone metabolic markers and their 1-year changes showed no genotype-related associations. Conclusio ns: The results of our population-based study indicate that apo E genotype does not modify lumbar or femoral neck BMDs or serum bone biochemical marke rs or their response to HRT in early postmenopausal Caucasian women. (C) 20 00 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.