Kj. Hardy et al., DRUG DOPING IN SENIOR AUSTRALIAN RULES FOOTBALL - A SURVEY FOR FREQUENCY, British journal of sports medicine, 31(2), 1997, pp. 126-128
Objectives-To determine by survey whether the frequency of use of perf
ormance enhancing drugs (drug doping) is significant in elite players
of Australian Rules football, and to compare this frequency with that
in other competitions. Methods-Randomised unannounced prospective urin
e testing during the period 1990-95 of players from the Australian Foo
tball League out of competition, in competition matches, and in finals
matches; testing was performed according to Olympic international Com
mittee protocols and standards. The players' identities and clubs were
unknown during testing. Results-Of 900 random urine tests, no positiv
e results were obtained for anabolic steroids, diuretics, caffeine, or
peptide hormones. Five positive results (0.6%) were obtained-for pseu
doephedrine in two instances, and for probenecid, methoxyphenamine, an
d dextropropoxyphene in one instance each. Each were inadvertent medic
al doping and declared before testing. Conclusions-Drug doping is not
a problem in the Australian Football League. This is probably because
no doping method is considered to be of value to Australian Rules foot
ball, because an educational programme is run by football authorities,
and because random during season and out of season testing for drugs
occurs.