Determination of language dominance using EEG spectral analysis versus theWada test in temporal epilepsy (right-handed subjects)

Citation
P. Corcia et al., Determination of language dominance using EEG spectral analysis versus theWada test in temporal epilepsy (right-handed subjects), NEUROP CLIN, 29(6), 1999, pp. 473-481
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09877053 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
473 - 481
Database
ISI
SICI code
0987-7053(199912)29:6<473:DOLDUE>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Spectral analysis of the EEG alpha rhythm was studied in nine temporal epil eptic right-handed patients in order to pi-edict localization of the speech area. We studied the variation of the spectral power of the alpha rhythm d uring nn activation paradigm previously validated ill normal right-handed s ubjects. Significant alpha power decreases in the left hemisphere during wr iting with the right hand ins compared to resting) and/or significant alpha power decreases in the right hemisphere during left-hand recognition and c lassification of cardboard objects las compared to resting) were considered as consistent with left-hemisphere dominance for language. The results of EEG spectral analysis were compared with those of the Wada test. The left h emisphere was dominant for language according to the Wada test in eight sub jects and the right hemisphere in one subject. Six patients had a significa nt alpha power reduction in the hemisphere concerned during lateralized cog nitive tasks, consistent with language localization in the left hemisphere according to the Wada test. The three remaining patients had no significant EEG spectral po,rer variations. A significant decrease of alpha power in t he active hemisphere during cerebral activation seems statistically related to left-hemispheric dominance for language in right-handed subjects (hemis pheric specialization). However; the localization of the speech area using this electrophysiological method does nor appear clinically relevant for a case-by-case decision in individual patients. (C) 1999 Editions scientifiqu es et medicales Elsevier SAS.