Objects variously called bipolar cores, pieces, esquillees, and other thing
s are abundant in the record. Some interpret them as the exhausted remnants
of bipolar reduction, others as wedges used with antler or bone. I propose
that we call them 'splintered pieces' to avoid functional connotations. Sp
lintered pieces illustrate the problem of equilfinality, different causes p
roducing like consequences. A growing but uncertain consensus regards most
splintered pieces as cores. Reviewing the latest expression of a different
interpretation, I conclude that experimental, ethnographic, and archaeologi
cal data continue to support the view that most--not all--splintered pieces
are cores. Nevertheless, the need remains urgent to search ethnographic ac
counts for support of the wedge view, to conduct further experiments, and t
o seek conclusive archaeological association of splintered pieces with wedg
ing.