Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study

Citation
Eb. Macdonald et al., Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study, OCC ENVIR M, 57(2), 2000, pp. 98-105
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
13510711 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
98 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
1351-0711(200002)57:2<98:RFOMTI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objectives-To identify the common core competencies required for occupation al physicians in Europe. Method-A modified Delphi survey was conducted among members of the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM), the Occupational Medicine Section of the Union of European Medical Specialities (UEMS), and of the European Network of Societies of Occupational Physicians (ENSOP). An initial questionnaire based on the training syllabus of the United Kingdom Faculty of Occupational Medicine was circulated and respondents were asked to rate the importance of each item. The results were discussed at a confe rence on the subject of competencies. A further questionnaire was developed and circulated which asked respondents to rank items within each section. Results-There was a 74% response in the first round and an 80% response in the second. Respondents' ratings from most important to least important wer e; occupational hazards to health, research methods, health promotion, occu pational health law and ethics, communications, assessment of disability, e nvironmental medicine, and management. In the second round, among those top ics ranked most highly were; hazards to health and the illnesses which they cause, control of risks, and diagnoses of work related ill health. Topics such as principles of occupational safety and selection of personal protect ion equipment were of least importance. Although the assessment of fitness was regarded as important, monitoring and advising on sickness absence were not highly rated. Management competency was regarded as of low importance. Conclusion-This survey identified that respondents had traditional disease focused views of the competencies required of occupational physicians and t hat competencies were lagging behind the evolving definition of occupationa l health.