Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures

Citation
K. Michaelsson et al., Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures, OSTEOPOR IN, 10(6), 1999, pp. 487-494
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0937941X → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
487 - 494
Database
ISI
SICI code
0937-941X(1999)10:6<487:DIRFPB>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The two types of hip fracture - cervical and trochanteric femoral fractures - are generally considered together in etiologic studies. However, women w ith a trochanteric fracture may be more osteoporotic than those with cervic al hip fractures, and have higher postfracture mortality. To explore differ ences in risk factor patterns between the two types of hip fracture we used data from a large population-based case-control study in Swedish women, 50 -81 years of age. Data were collected by questionnaire, to which more than 80% of subjects responded. Of the cases included, 811 had had a cervical fr acture and 483 a trochanteric fracture during the study period; these cases were compared with 3312 randomly selected controls. Height and hormonal fa ctors appeared to affect the risk of the two types of hip fracture differen tly. For every 5 cm of current height, women with a cervical fracture had a n adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.15-1.32) compared with an OR o f 1.06 (95% CI 0.97-1.15) for women with trochanteric fractures. Later meno pausal age was protective for trochanteric fractures (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91- 0.99 per 2 years) but no such association was found for cervical fractures. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.1 2-1.95) for trochanteric fractures and 1.22 (95% CI 0.98-1.52) for cervical fractures. Current hormone replacement therapy was similarly protective fo r both fracture types, but former use substantially reduced risk only for t rochanteric fractures: OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.33-0.92) compared with 1.00 (95% C I 0.71-1.39) for cervical fractures. These risk factor patterns suggest eti ologic differences between the fracture types which have to be considered w hen planning preventing interventions.