Shared decision-making is considered an important ideal for physician-patie
nt interaction. The ideal states that health-related values should be discu
ssed together. It raises two questions: (a) for which decisions is the idea
l of shared decision-making relevant? (b) Which aspects of treatment should
be discussed? The nephrological practice under consideration in this artic
le answers question (a) as follows: decisions about the type of dialysis ar
e shared decisions, while decisions about the moment to start dialysis are
medical decisions that should be taken by nephrologists. This situation can
be criticized as important health-related values play a role in decisions
about starting dialysis. Question (b) is answered in the nephrological prac
tice under consideration by discussing at least all important health-relate
d aspects that raise uncertainty about its worth for a patient. This approa
ch to question (b) is morally and practically defensible. (C) 2000 Elsevier
Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.