Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?

Authors
Citation
A. Lelie, Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?, PAT EDUC C, 39(1), 2000, pp. 81-89
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
ISSN journal
07383991 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
81 - 89
Database
ISI
SICI code
0738-3991(200001)39:1<81:DINSDM>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Shared decision-making is considered an important ideal for physician-patie nt interaction. The ideal states that health-related values should be discu ssed together. It raises two questions: (a) for which decisions is the idea l of shared decision-making relevant? (b) Which aspects of treatment should be discussed? The nephrological practice under consideration in this artic le answers question (a) as follows: decisions about the type of dialysis ar e shared decisions, while decisions about the moment to start dialysis are medical decisions that should be taken by nephrologists. This situation can be criticized as important health-related values play a role in decisions about starting dialysis. Question (b) is answered in the nephrological prac tice under consideration by discussing at least all important health-relate d aspects that raise uncertainty about its worth for a patient. This approa ch to question (b) is morally and practically defensible. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.