This article analyzes survey data to explore how companies with specific su
pplier development programs overcame common pitfalls in assisting their sup
pliers improve their performance. The authors provide a process map for dep
loying supplier-development initiatives. After identifying critical commodi
ties and suppliers, a cross-functional team meets with top managers at the
supplier firms to discuss areas of improvement as well as key metrics and c
ost-sharing mechanisms needed to evaluate the success of the effort. Lastly
, firms need to monitor and modify their supplier development strategies, a
s appropriate. The survey data indicate that organizations generally experi
ence three types of pitfalls, mostly in the final stages of the process.
Supplier-specific pitfalls stem from a lack of initial commitment. Companie
s can avoid these by using evaluation systems that compare measurements and
performance among suppliers, holding kaizen events at supplier sites, iden
tifying cost-saving opportunities through target pricing, and designating a
supplier employee to ensure that buyer-supplied training is put into pract
ice. Tying a supplier's performance improvement to receiving future orders
is a particularly dramatic way to get the attention of managers at a suppli
er. Same buyers also offer their resources to suppliers, such as providing
personnel support for some period of time to improve operations or building
training centers for supplier use.
Buyer-specific pitfalls also stem from a lack of commitment. Consolidating
purchases to one or a few suppliers is one approach to creating the volume
needed to justify investing in a supplier-development effort with the remai
ning suppliers. Examining how these suppliers impact the quality of product
s or using total-cost-of-ownership data can yield further proof of the bene
fits of supplier development.
Buyer-supplier interlace pitfalls originate in the areas of trust, alignmen
t, and communication. Although written contracts may be important, some buy
ers rely more on close relationships rather than on contracts to build trus
t. Others use "expectation road maps" to tell suppliers where they are goin
g and better ensure buyer/supplier alignment. Financial incentives, "design
ed in" supplier products, and expected contract renewal are also incentives
for gaining a supplier's commitment to a supplier-development effort.