Responsibility audits are a management tool for demonstrating the potential
qualitative and financial benefits of mirroring core values and ethics in
day-to-day practice. Waddock and Smith argue that corporate financial perfo
rmance and socially responsible practices are positively correlated. They o
utline a responsibility auditing process that improves both the bottom line
and a firm's stakeholder relationships with owners, employees, suppliers,
customers, local communities, and government entities.
Companies typically overlook the hidden costs of problematic or less respon
sible practices. The authors cite examples of how operating responsible oft
en saves money (in overhead, employee turnover rates, insurance costs, and
other non-value-added expenses) and may even create profitable new opportun
ities. .
Eight companies beta tested the authors' responsibility audit by comparing
their operating practices with their formally stated vision, values, and mi
ssion. All uncovered deficiencies in four operating areas: employee relatio
ns, quality systems, community relations, and environmental practices. The
audit process consistently revealed that when a company adopted proactive,
responsible practices, it reaped measurable improvements in efficiency and
productivity, lowered legal exposure and risks to the company's reputation,
and reduced direct and overhead costs. By creating an adaptive and proacti
ve corporate culture from the top down, operating responsibly becomes a cor
e business strategy.