Serological markers of recurrent beta cell destruction in diabetic patients undergoing pancreatic transplantation

Citation
C. Thivolet et al., Serological markers of recurrent beta cell destruction in diabetic patients undergoing pancreatic transplantation, TRANSPLANT, 69(1), 2000, pp. 99-103
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
00411337 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
99 - 103
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1337(20000115)69:1<99:SMORBC>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Background Besides alloimmunity to transplanted pancreatic tissue, recurren t autoimmune beta cell destruction is an additional limitation to successfu l clinical pancreatic allografts in type 1 diabetic patients. Methods. We studied the prevalence of autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxy lase (GAD) 65 and tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2) in 68 C-peptide-negative diab etic: patients receiving pancreatic allografts. Sera from patients were obt ained immediately before grafting, A. second blood sample was analyzed at t he time of graft failure in patients who returned to hyperglycemia and duri ng the same follow-up period in those who experienced a functional pancreat ic allograft. Patients were classified according to clinical outcome into c hronic graft failure (group A, n=20), acute graft failure and/or arterial t hrombosis (n=7), or functional pancreatic graft (group C, n=41). Sera from patients were screened for the presence of specific autoanti- bodies using an islet cell autoantibody assay, a combi-GAD and IA-2 test, and individual GAD and IA-2 assays. Results. Patients from group A had significantly higher combi-test values t han patients from group C (13+/-16 vs. 4.5+/-12 units, P<0.02) and higher a nti-GAD65 antibody (Ab) levels (0.19+/-0.3 vs. 0.04+/-0.13 units, P<0.01) i mmediately before grafting. After graft failure in group A, both anti-GAD65 and anti-IA-a Ab levels increased from baseline, but only the increase in anti-IA-2 Ab levels reached statistical significance (0.28+/-0.12 vs. 15+/- 34, P=0.03). When compared with group C, patients from group A had higher a nti-GAD65 Abs (0.29+/-0.35 vs, 0.05+/-0.16, P<0.001) after graft failure, I nterestingly, the number of double-Ah-positive patients rose from 5% to 35% in group A, whereas it remained at 5% in group C. In pancreatic transplant s with bladder drainage, the presence of anti-GAD65 and/or anti-IA2 Abs was not associated with a reduction in urinary amylase levels, This suggests t hat a loss of endocrine function was not associated with exocrine failure i n patients from group A, Conclusions. We can conclude from the present study that peripheral autoimm une markers are useful in diabetic patients receiving pancreatic allografts .