Jp. Ciezki et al., Cost comparison of radical prostatectomy and transperineal brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer, UROLOGY, 55(1), 2000, pp. 68-72
Objectives. To compare perioperative costs associated with radical retropub
ic prostatectomy (RRP) to transperineal brachytherapy (BXRT) with iodine-12
5 (I-125) seeds in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
Methods. Actual costs per case for the perioperative period were compiled p
rospectively for 583 consecutive patients undergoing RRP or BXRT between Ja
nuary I, 1997 and October 30, 1998 using a hospital-wide cost accounting sy
stem. The total cost per case included both technical and professional comp
onents. The technical costs included those incurred for anesthesiology, lab
oratory medicine, medicine, pharmacy, nursing, radiology, I-125 seeds, and
BXRT technicians. Professional costs included fees from anesthesiology, lab
oratory, medicine, urology, radiation oncology, and physics. Cases were div
ided into three groups for analysis: group 1, RRP (n = 404); group 2, BXRT
with planning ultrasound performed in the office setting before implantatio
n (n = 107); and group 3, BXRT with planning ultrasound performed in the op
erating room at the time of implantation (n = 72). Results are reported as
relative cost ratios, with RRP assigned a relative cost of 1.0.
Results. The total relative perioperative cost for BXRT exceeded that for R
RP by 85% to 105%. Technical cost, exclusive of I-125 seeds, was substantia
lly lower for BXRT (relative cost 0.36 to 0,42) but was more than offset by
the cost of the seeds when comparing total cost with RRP. Performance of t
he planning ultrasound in the operating room (group 3) increased the total
cost by 20%. The categorical technical costs for both BXRT groups were sign
ificantly lower for anesthesiology, laboratory medicine, medicine, pharmacy
, and nursing but were significantly higher for radiology. The total profes
sional costs were similar for all groups.
Conclusions. Perioperative costs of BXRT with I-125 seeds are substantially
higher than RRP In the treatment of localized prostate cancer, primarily b
ecause of the cost of the seeds. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.