J. Lattanzi et al., Ultrasound-based stereotactic guidance of precision conformal external beam radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer, UROLOGY, 55(1), 2000, pp. 73-78
Objectives. Use of external beam radiation fields that conform to the shape
of the target improves biochemical control in prostate cancer by facilitat
ing dose escalation through increased sparing of normal tissue. By correcti
ng potential organ motion and setup errors, ultrasound-directed stereotacti
c localization is a method that may improve the accuracy and effectiveness
of current conformal technology. The purpose of this study was to quantify
the precision of the transabdominal ultrasound-based approach using compute
d tomography (CT) as a standard.
Methods. Thirty-five consecutive men participated in a prospective comparis
on of daily CT and ultrasound-guided localization at Fox Chase Cancer Cente
r. Daily CT prostate localization was completed before the delivery of each
final boost field. In the CT simulation suite, transabdominal ultrasound-b
ased stereotactic localization was also performed. The main outcome measure
was a three-dimensional comparison of prostate position as determined by C
T versus ultrasound.
Results. Sixty-nine daily CT and ultrasound prostate position shifts were r
ecorded for 35 patients. The magnitude of difference between the CT and ult
rasound localization ranged from 0 to 7.0 mm in the anterior/posterior, 0 t
o 6.4 mm in the lateral, and 0 to 6.7 mm in the superior/inferior dimension
. The corresponding directed average disagreements were extremely small: an
terior/posterior, -0.09 +/- 2.8 mm SD; lateral, -0.16 +/- 2.4 mm SD; and su
perior/inferior, -0.03 +/- 2.3 mm SD). Analysis of the paired CT-ultrasound
shifts revealed a high correlation between the two modalities in all three
dimensions (anterior/ posterior r = 0.88; lateral r = 0.91; and superior/i
nferior r = 0.87).
Conclusions. Ultrasound-directed stereotactic localization is safe and as a
ccurate as CT scanning in targeting the prostate for conformal external bea
m radiation therapy. The application of this technology to current conforma
l techniques will allow the reduction of treatment margins in all dimension
s. This should diminish treatment-related morbidity and facilitate further
dose escalation, resulting in improved cancer control. (C) 2000, Elsevier S
cience Inc.