A foliar rinse study of the dry deposition of nitric acid to a coniferous forest

Citation
R. Janson et L. Granat, A foliar rinse study of the dry deposition of nitric acid to a coniferous forest, AGR FOR MET, 98-9, 1999, pp. 683-696
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
ISSN journal
01681923 → ACNP
Volume
98-9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
683 - 696
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-1923(199912)98-9:<683:AFRSOT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The foliar rinse method was used to study the deposition of nitric acid to a coniferous forest at the NOPEX site (NOrthern hemisphere climate Processe s land-surface EXperiment) in Sweden, (60 degrees 05'N, 17 degrees 30'E) in July and August 1994. Ambient concentrations of HNO3, NH3, NO3(p) and NH4( p) were measured concurrently in and above the canopy with rotating wet ann ular denuders and Teflon + nylon filterpacks. Tt was demonstrated that diff erent branches of the same species take up different amounts of nitrate per needle area, when hung freely and side by side in the field. Branches used in a deposition study must be 'calibrated' against each other. A large dif ference in the flux to branches of different species was also found. The fl ux (per total leaf area) to branches of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) was f ound to be 1.7 +/- 0.3 times greater than the flux to Norway spruce (Picea abies) under identical conditions. At the NOPEX site, the relative Aux to t he upper interior, middle exterior, and middle interior parts of the crown was found to be 70, 40, and 30%, respectively, of the Bur to the upper exte rior parts of the crown. Most the deposited nitrate was estimated to come f rom HNO3, as particulate nitrate accounted for only about 16% of the total atmospheric nitrate and did not show any concentration gradient from inside the forest to above. The deposition of ammonia could not be evaluated from the foliar rinse, but a comparison of the NH3 and NH4(p) concentration dat a suggests that its daytime deposition velocity was similar to that of HNO3 , although there was large scatter in the data. Estimates of the daytime de position velocity of HNO3 and two of the nighttime estimates were in relati vely good agreement with those obtained from the inferential method using t he big leaf model. Three of the nighttime values were a factor 2-3 higher. The reason(s) for the discrepancy are not known, but could mean that infere ntial techniques can, under some nighttime conditions, seriously underestim ate the Bur of nitrate to the forest ecosystem. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B .V. All rights reserved.