Ex vivo flow cytometry determination of intracytoplasmic expression of IL-2, IL-6, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha in monocytes and T lymphocytes, in chronic hemodialysis patients
L. Rostaing et al., Ex vivo flow cytometry determination of intracytoplasmic expression of IL-2, IL-6, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha in monocytes and T lymphocytes, in chronic hemodialysis patients, AM J NEPHR, 20(1), 2000, pp. 18-26
Aims: To determine the intracytoplasmic expression of TNF-alpha, IL-2, IL-6
and IFN-gamma, ex vivo and in vitro, in both monocytes and T lymphocytes b
y flow cytometry after appropriate stimulation using phorbol myristate acet
ate (PMA)/ionomycin or lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the presence of monensi
n, in order to assess the bio(in)compatibility of different dialysis membra
nes. Methods: We examined monocytes and T lymphocytes taken from chronic he
modialysis patients (using either cuprophane (CUP), n = 6; polyacrylonitril
e (AN 69), n = 6; or polysulfone (PS), n = 6 membranes), before and after a
dialysis session. We compared the results with those obtained from end-sta
ge chronic renal failure patients (n = 3) and healthy volunteers (n = 11).
Results: Before any stimulation there was a statistically significant diffe
rence in the percentages of TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IFN-gamma- expressing mono
cytes with respect to the dialysis membrane used. The highest percentages w
ere observed for CUP and AN69: patients with figures of around 30% for each
cytokine; the lowest percentages were found in PS patients and healthy vol
unteers. One hour after LPS stimulation the patterns remained unchanged for
TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, whereas the percentages of IL-6-expressing cells
in PS patients and in healthy volunteers reached the figures obtained in th
e other groups. When we examined the percentage of IFN-gamma-, TNF-alpha- a
nd IL-6-expressing monocytes in patients before and after a dialysis sessio
n, before any stimulation, we found that the results were significantly dif
ferent for the three membranes (p = 0.01). Thus, a dialysis session with po
lysulfone membranes had no significant effect on the precentages of IFN-gam
ma-, TNF-alpha-, and IL-6-expressing monocytes, whereas percentages were si
gnificantly lower after the dialysis session when using cuprophane or AN69
membranes, suggesting a release of these cytokines by the monocytes during
dialysis. A significant number of IFN-gamma- and IL-2-expressing T lymphocy
tes were only detected after 18 hours of PMA/ionomycin stimulation. The per
centages of IFN-gamma-expressing T cells recorded for the different membran
es were not statistically different from those recorded for healthy subject
s or pre-dialysis patients, i.e., they were between 11.5 and 20%. However,
the percentages of IL-2-expressing T lymphocytes were significantly differe
nt between the 5 groups, i.e., 31.3, 30.5, 18.6, 13.9 and 7.6%, respectivel
y, for CUP patients, pre-dialysis patients, healthy volunteers, PS and AN69
patients. This suggests that pre-dialysis and CUP patients have, at baseli
ne, a stimulation of their T lymphocytes. Finally, a 4-hour dialysis sessio
n had no impact on the percentages of IL-2-expressing T lymphocytes, wherea
s it was associated with a significant decrease in the percentage of IFN-ga
mma-expressing cells, but only when cuprophane membranes were used. Conclus
ion: Cytokine flow cytometry enables one to study, ex vivo, i.e., without a
ny stimulation of the cells, and in vitro after appropriate stimulation, th
e bio(in)compatibility of dialysis membranes assessed by the intracytoplasm
ic cytokine profiles of TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-6 and IL-2, evaluated at t
he single cell level. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.