A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra
Pk. Sand et al., A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra, AM J OBST G, 182(1), 2000, pp. 30-34
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare a modified Burch procedure
with a suburethral sling for the treatment of stress incontinence complicat
ed by a low-pressure urethra.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-six women with stress incontinence, low-pressure ureth
ra, and urethral hypermobility (straining cotton swab angle greater than or
equal to 30 degrees) were randomly assigned to undergo either a modified B
urch procedure (n = 19) or a suburethral sling (n = 17). Objective and subj
ective cure rates at 3 months after the operation were the primary outcome
measures. Comparisons of group means were performed with the Student t test
for independent groups, and proportions were compared with the Fisher exac
t test.
RESULTS: After the operation the 2 groups had statistically similar cure ra
tes and voiding function. Urethral closure pressure, pressure transmission
ratios, and maximum detrusor pressure during voiding were significantly hig
her in the sling group.
CONCLUSION: At 3 months there were no clinically significant differences be
tween the groups treated with suburethral sling and modified Burch procedur
es.