Supraglottic combined frequency jet ventilation versus subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery

Citation
A. Bacher et al., Supraglottic combined frequency jet ventilation versus subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 90(2), 2000, pp. 460-465
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
ISSN journal
00032999 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
460 - 465
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(200002)90:2<460:SCFJVV>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of gas exchange during supraglottic combined-frequ ency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope and during monofreq uent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL). Tw enty-three anesthetized (propofol, fentanyl, vecuronium) patients undergoin g microlaryngeal surgery were prospectively studied and randomly assigned t o one of two groups. The patients' lungs were ventilated with combined-freq uency jet ventilation (10 min, 15 and 600 breaths/min, inspiration/expirati on time ratio = 1, driving pressure 750-1500 mm Hg), monofrequent (low-freq uency group: 15 breaths/min; high-frequency group: 600 breaths/min) jet ven tilation (20 min), and again combined-frequency jet ventilation (15 min). P aO2 PaCO2 and the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2) were measured. Wilcoxo n's signed rank test was applied. During monofrequent jet ventilation, PaCO 2 increased and the PaO2/FIO2 decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as compare d with combined-frequency jet ventilation (low-frequency group: PaCO2 from 39.4 +/- 3.3 to 50.8 +/- 8.0 mm Hg, PaO2/FIO2 from 306 +/- 100 to 225 +/- 9 4 mm Hg; high-frequency group: PaCO2 from 36.7 +/- 7.2 to 60.3 +/- 6.1 mm H g, PaO2/FIO2 from 429 +/- 87 to 190 +/- 51 mm Hg; mean +/- SD). After switc hing back to combined-frequency jet ventilation, PaCO2 decreased and PaO2/F IO2 increased to baseline levels. We conclude that gas exchange during micr olaryngeal surgery can be more easily maintained with supraglottic combined -frequency jet ventilation than with subglottic monofrequent jet ventilatio n via the Mon-Jet catheter. implications: This study demonstrates that the combination of high- and low-frequency supraglottic jet ventilation via a j et ventilation laryngoscope provides a better pulmonary gas exchange and al lows more accurate airway pressure monitoring during microlaryngeal surgery than subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter.