A. Bacher et al., Supraglottic combined frequency jet ventilation versus subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery, ANESTH ANAL, 90(2), 2000, pp. 460-465
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We compared the efficacy of gas exchange during supraglottic combined-frequ
ency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope and during monofreq
uent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL). Tw
enty-three anesthetized (propofol, fentanyl, vecuronium) patients undergoin
g microlaryngeal surgery were prospectively studied and randomly assigned t
o one of two groups. The patients' lungs were ventilated with combined-freq
uency jet ventilation (10 min, 15 and 600 breaths/min, inspiration/expirati
on time ratio = 1, driving pressure 750-1500 mm Hg), monofrequent (low-freq
uency group: 15 breaths/min; high-frequency group: 600 breaths/min) jet ven
tilation (20 min), and again combined-frequency jet ventilation (15 min). P
aO2 PaCO2 and the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO2) were measured. Wilcoxo
n's signed rank test was applied. During monofrequent jet ventilation, PaCO
2 increased and the PaO2/FIO2 decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as compare
d with combined-frequency jet ventilation (low-frequency group: PaCO2 from
39.4 +/- 3.3 to 50.8 +/- 8.0 mm Hg, PaO2/FIO2 from 306 +/- 100 to 225 +/- 9
4 mm Hg; high-frequency group: PaCO2 from 36.7 +/- 7.2 to 60.3 +/- 6.1 mm H
g, PaO2/FIO2 from 429 +/- 87 to 190 +/- 51 mm Hg; mean +/- SD). After switc
hing back to combined-frequency jet ventilation, PaCO2 decreased and PaO2/F
IO2 increased to baseline levels. We conclude that gas exchange during micr
olaryngeal surgery can be more easily maintained with supraglottic combined
-frequency jet ventilation than with subglottic monofrequent jet ventilatio
n via the Mon-Jet catheter. implications: This study demonstrates that the
combination of high- and low-frequency supraglottic jet ventilation via a j
et ventilation laryngoscope provides a better pulmonary gas exchange and al
lows more accurate airway pressure monitoring during microlaryngeal surgery
than subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter.