Respiration is poorly represented in whole plant or ecosystem models relati
ve to photosynthesis. This paper reviews the principles underlying the deve
lopment of a more mechanistic approach to modelling plant respiration and t
he criteria by which model behaviour might be judged. The main conclusions
are as follows: (1) Models should separate C substrate From structure so th
at direct or indirect C substrate dependence of the components of respirati
on can be represented. (2) Account should be taken of the fact that some of
the energy for leaf respiration is drawn from the light reactions of photo
synthesis. (3) It is possible to estimate respiration associated with growt
h, nitrate reduction, symbiotic N-2 fixation, N-uptake, other ion uptake an
d phloem loading, because reasonable estimates are available of average spe
cific unit respiratory costs and the rates of these processes can be quanti
fied. (4) At present, it is less easy to estimate respiration associated wi
th protein turnover, maintenance of cell ion concentrations and gradients a
nd all forms of respiration involving the alternative pathway and futile cy
cles. (5) The growth-maintenance paradigm is valuable bur 'maintenance' is
an approximate concept and there is no rigorous division between growth and
maintenance energy-requiring processes. (6) An alternative 'process-residu
al' approach would be to estimate explicitly respiratory fluxes associated
with the six processes listed in (3) above and treat the remainder as a res
idual with a phenomenological 'residual maintenance' coefficient. (7) Maint
enance or 'residual maintenance' respiration rates are often more closely r
elated to tissue N content than biomass, volume or surface area. (8) Respir
atory fluxes associated with different processes vary independently, season
ally and during plant development, and so should be represented separately
if possible. (9) An unforced outcome of mechanistic models should be a cons
trained, but non-constant, ratio between whole plant gross photosynthesis a
nd respiration. (C) 2000 Annals of Botany Company.