Docetaxel-cisplatin combination (DC) chemotherapy in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer

Citation
M. Spielmann et al., Docetaxel-cisplatin combination (DC) chemotherapy in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer, ANN ONCOL, 10(12), 1999, pp. 1457-1460
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
09237534 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1457 - 1460
Database
ISI
SICI code
0923-7534(199912)10:12<1457:DC(CIP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Purpose: The safety and efficacy of a docetaxel-cisplatin combination (DC) were evaluated in 41 patients pretreated for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and methods: The first 2 patients received 85 mg/m(2) docetaxel fo llowed, 6 hours later, by 80 mg/m(2) cisplatin repeated every 3 weeks; the other 39 received the same regimen, with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel. Appropriate dose reductions but no growth factor administration were planned. Treatment was continued until disease progression, excessive toxicity or patient ref usal. Results: A total of 223 chemotherapy courses were administered, with a medi an of 6 cycles per patient (range 1-8). All 41 patients were assessed for t oxicity using NCI-CTC. Severe neutropenia was experienced by 38 patients (9 3%) (11 at grade 3, 27 at grade 4, 10 with febrile neutropenia). There was one death due to neutropenic septic shock. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurre d in three patients (7%). Five patients (12%) had grade 2 neurosensory toxi city, two (5%) experiencing partial hearing loss. Grade 3 fluid retention o ccurred in three patients (7%). Of 38 anthracycline-resistant patients, 33 were evaluable for response. Two had a complete response (CR) and ten a partial response (PR), giving an ob jective response rate of 36%, (95% CI: 20%-55%). Stable disease (SD) was ob served in 14 patients (42%), 7 (21%) had progressive disease (PD). Among th e three non-resistant patients, two PRs and one SD were observed. Median du ration of response was 29 weeks (range 18-70), median time to progression 2 1 weeks (4-70), and median overall survival 50 weeks (4-104+). Conclusions: This DC regimen is active, with an acceptable safety profile i n anthracycline-resistant ABC patients. Its place as a second-line treatmen t alternative to docetaxel alone or to other second-line combination regime ns remains to be determined.