Whose mandate? Policy promises, strong bicameralism and polled opinion

Authors
Citation
M. Goot, Whose mandate? Policy promises, strong bicameralism and polled opinion, AUST J POL, 34(3), 1999, pp. 327-352
Citations number
144
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
10361146 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
327 - 352
Database
ISI
SICI code
1036-1146(199911)34:3<327:WMPPSB>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The political theory of Australian politics has been dominated, since the e lection of a Liberal-National Party government in 1996, by claims and count erclaims about electoral mandates. The government has privileged its positi on in the House of Representatives; opposition parties have pointed to thei r support in the Senate. This paper provides a historical re-examination of the meanings and merits of mandate theories; it outlines the difficulties posed by strong bicameralism for any mandate theory; and it shows how the r ise of survey research has strengthened some claims to a mandate, especiall y in bicameral systems, while weakening others.