Are rules and entries enough? Historical reflections on a longstanding controversy

Citation
B. Nerlich et Dd. Clarke, Are rules and entries enough? Historical reflections on a longstanding controversy, BEHAV BRAIN, 22(6), 1999, pp. 1032
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
ISSN journal
0140525X → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-525X(199912)22:6<1032:ARAEEH>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
For language to function we clearly need two formal ordering principles: le xical entries and rules. Clahsen's target article provides multiple empiric al evidence for tills distinction, but this may be simply to over-confirm t he undeniable and to overlook the hidden motor of language use and language development, namely, function. Since at least 1859, linguists have argued for the primacy of function, and these arguments are worth rediscovering to day.