The following discussion aims to illuminate further the way in which morpho
logically complex words are represented in the mental lexicon. It is argued
that the dual-mechanism model can accommodate the linguistic and psycholin
guistic evidence currently available, not only on German inflection (as poi
nted out in the target article) but also on other languages (as presented i
n several commentaries). Associative singie-mechanism models of inflection,
on the other hand, provide only partial accounts.