In socially monogamous species it is rare for females to be more intensely
colored than males. The barn owl (Tyto alba) is one of the exceptions, as f
emales usually exhibit more and larger black spots on the plumage. The evol
ution of sexual dimorphism in plumage traits is commonly assumed to be the
result of sexual selection. I therefore examined the prediction that male b
arn owls do not pair randomly with respect to female plumage spottiness dur
ing a 5-year study in Switzerland. The prediction was supported, as males t
hat changed mates acquired a new female that was similarly sported to the p
revious one, and pairing with respect to plumage spottiness was positively
assortative. Significant repeatability in male pairing was presumably neith
er the consequence of sharing the same habitats with females displaying a g
iven plumage spottiness nor of morphological characteristics of the males t
hat could influence mate sampling. A resemblance in plumage spottiness betw
een the mates of sons and of their father suggests that repeatability could
have resulted from sexual imprinting and/or heritable variance in male pre
ference for spotted females. To test whether males assess female plumage sp
ottiness, I either cut off black spots or small pieces of feathers but nor
the spots of already mated females. Males mated to females with reduced plu
mage spottiness fed their brood at a lower cadency and achieved a lower rep
roductive success than other males. This experiment further suggests thar f
emale plumage spottiness is a stimulus for males.