Cs. Bretherton et al., A GCSS boundary-layer cloud model intercomparison study of the first ASTEXLagrangian experiment, BOUND-LAY M, 93(3), 1999, pp. 341-380
Three single-column models (all with an explicit liquid water budget and co
mpara-tively high vertical resolution) and three two-dimensional eddy-resol
ving models (including one with bin-resolved microphysics) are compared wit
h observations from the first ASTEX Lagrangian experiment. This intercompar
ison was a part of the second GCSS boundary-layer cloud modelling workshop
in August 1995.
In the air column tracked during the first ASTEX Lagrangian experiment, a s
hallow subtropical drizzling stratocumulus-capped marine boundary layer dee
pens after two days into a cumulus capped boundary layer with patchy strato
cumulus. The models are forced with time varying boundary conditions at the
sea-surface and the capping inversion to simulate the changing environment
of the air column.
The models all predict the observed deepening and decoupling of the boundar
y layer quite well, with cumulus cloud evolution and thinning of the overly
ing stratocumulus. Thus these models all appear capable of predicting trans
itions between cloud and boundary-layer types with some skill. The models a
lso produce realistic drizzle rates, but there are substantial quantitative
differences in the cloud cover and liquid water path between models. The d
ifferences between the eddy-resolving model results are nearly as large as
between the single column model results. The eddy resolving models give a m
ore detailed picture of the boundary-layer evolution than the single-column
models, but are still sensitive to the choice of microphysical and radiati
ve parameterizations, sub-grid-scale turbulence models, and probably model
resolution and dimensionality. One important example of the differences see
n in these parameterizations is the absorption of solar radiation in a spec
ified cloud layer, which varied by a factor of four between the model radia
tion parameterizations.