The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and durat
ion to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anth
racycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing Various definitions of anthrac
ycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 pati
ents with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical
trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (A
CCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973
and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using defin
itions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive dis
ease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disea
se while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2,
n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3
, n = 233), and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (
Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these p
atients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinbl
astine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, b
ut not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar b
etween the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens.
Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1
and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were
21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between
the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0
.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defin
ed anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with
resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3
and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable
prognosis. (C) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.